rjmccall added a comment. Yeah, if there are actually differences in the set of keywords, that's a totally reasonable thing to handle in the lexer.
================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def:255 +// KEYNOOPENCL - This is a keyword that is not supported in OpenCL C +// nor in OpenCL C++. // KEYALTIVEC - This is a keyword in AltiVec ---------------- `KEYNOOPENCL` is dead now, I think. ================ Comment at: lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp:621 + // OpenCL C++ 1.0 s2.9: the thread_local storage qualifier is not + // supported. + case TSCS_thread_local: ---------------- Do you really care about the spelling of the specifier? Presumably `__thread` (the GNU extension) and `_Thread_local` (the C11 feature) are unsupported; where are those diagnosed? https://reviews.llvm.org/D46022 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
