a.sidorin added a comment. > `E->getFoundDecl().getDecl()` can be null when a member expression does not > involve lookup. (Note, it may involve a lookup in case of a using directive > which refers to a member function in a base class template.)
Yes, a pretty weird example. Unfortunately, they are pretty common for XTU. > I hoped that this patch could be accepted without tests, since it is very > small and the changes are pretty straight forward, so I thought it can be > easily verified by a review. Yes, this is the reason why I have accepted it initially. I think we can accept this patch without a test but I'd like to get a somebody else's review. @xazax.hun, @szepet, could you take a look? @martong Could you include the reason why this patch lacks tests into the commit message (including description of the situation where the code fails)? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46019 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
