sammccall added a comment.
Code looks good/simple, just a couple of design questions
================
Comment at: clangd/ClangdUnit.cpp:362
CI->getFrontendOpts().DisableFree = false;
+ CI->getLangOpts()->CommentOpts.ParseAllComments = true;
}
----------------
Any idea about whether this will affect performance significantly?
Less for this patch, and more for whether this should be an option in the
future that we might e.g. only do during indexing.
================
Comment at: clangd/CodeComplete.cpp:707
CI->getFrontendOpts().DisableFree = false;
+ CI->getLangOpts()->CommentOpts.ParseAllComments = true;
----------------
Are we sure we want to do this in code complete? I would have thought the more
natural approach would be to implement resolve in terms of lookup in the index,
and only provide it there.
The lack of good support for resolve in YCM LSP shouldn't be a problem as YCM
doesn't actually use doc comments (I think?).
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46002
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
