erik.pilkington added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp:2342 + if (isa<AutoType>(Ty)) + return false; return true; ---------------- rjmccall wrote: > rjmccall wrote: > > rjmccall wrote: > > > I agree with your analysis that this shouldn't be a substitution > > > candidate. However, I think this probably needs an ABI-compatibility > > > guard. > > You should probably add a comment like "Prior to LLVM v6, Clang > > accidentally treated deduced auto types as substitution candidates." > Er, not "prior to", I guess. "through", maybe, or "up to and including". Sure, I added that comment into the new patch. You meant to say "undeduced auto types", right? Deduced auto types should have been desugared to their underlying type before this function get called in mangleType(). https://reviews.llvm.org/D45451 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
