shiva0217 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44888#1068806, @asb wrote:
> Thanks Kito. -mrelax and -mno-relax currently only affect the backend. For > completeness, I think this patch needs to pass the appropriate flag to the > linker depending on relax/no-relax. Hi Alex. RISCVToolChain class does not define yet, so we can't pass --no-relax in RISCV::Linker::ConstructJob. Should we passing --no-relax when we introduce RISCVToolchain? Or there is another place we could implement passing RISCV linker flags? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D44888 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
