erichkeane added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45383#1062099, @efriedma wrote:

> Basically, yes, although I was thinking you could be a bit more aggressive.  
> At least, anything marked "t" for custom typechecking is probably not 
> something which should be redeclared.


Ok, thank you very much for your help!  I'll see if I can accomplish soon!


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D45383



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to