rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45384#1060369, @ahatanak wrote:
> Yes. I intended it as a property that propagates to classes that contain or > derive from the type. > > Would it make it less confusing if I merged CXXRecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters > and RecordDecl::CannotPassInRegisters into a single enum? For example, the > enum could have three enumerators, "CanPass", "CannotPass", "CanNeverPass", > or something. Both "CannotPass" and "CanNeverPass" would force the type to be > passed indirectly, and the only difference is that "CanNeverPass" propagates > its property outwards and "CannotPass" doesn't. C structs are either > "CanPass" or "CanNeverPass" while C++ structs can take any of the three > values. Yes, I think that would help a lot. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45384 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
