efriedma added a comment. Yes, the standard says you're allowed to throw an exception from the random_device constructor, or use a PRNG with an arbitrary seed, or even just return zeros from operator(). But none of those behaviors are actually useful; the code will compile, but you won't get the expected randomness. So I prefer this solution, even if it isn't strictly standard-compliant.
(I'll post an updated version with the tests fixed soon.) https://reviews.llvm.org/D41316 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
