lichray added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libcxx/trunk/include/__split_buffer:201
__alloc_rr& __a = this->__alloc();
+ pointer __to_be_end = this->__end_;
do
----------------
mclow.lists wrote:
> I have been asked specifically by the optimizer folks to NOT do things like
> this in libc++, but rather to file bugs against the optimizer.
>
> And I have done so for this exact case:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35637
From the thread I didn't see that the compiler side asked you not to do so.
And I disagree with the view. libc++ shouldn't *wait* for compilers, because
we don't dictate users' compiler choices. This change doesn't make libc++
worse to coming compilers, and makes libc++ better on existing compilers, so
what benefit we get by not approving this?
Repository:
rCXX libc++
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44823
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
