lebedev.ri added a comment. I'm having a very hard time following this thread. In fact, i can't follow the logic at all.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44559#1041007, @rjmccall wrote: > ... > This patch, however, is contrary to the design of -Wconversion, which does > attempt to avoid warning in cases where the user might reasonably see an > operation as "really" being performed in its operand type. If you want to > argue that we should change the design of -Wconversion, that is a broader > conversation that you should take to cfe-dev. Can you at least point out where the current design goals are documented? https://reviews.llvm.org/D44559 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
