lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44559#1040799, @rjmccall wrote:
> I think we're correct not to warn here and that GCC/ICC are being noisy. The > existence of a temporary promotion to a wider type doesn't justify warning on > arithmetic between two operands that are the same size as the ultimate > result. It is totally fair for users to think of this operation as being > "closed" on the original type. Could you please clarify, are you saying that PR35409 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409> is not a bug, and clang should continue to not warn in those cases? If we would have "conversion sanitizer" <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530>, detection of such problems would be easy, but without it, right now it is rather hard to detect such issues... Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44559 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
