vsapsai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103#1027664, @vsk wrote:
> Is the test expected to pass with clang-902? If not, then it'd be best to use > "apple-clang-9" instead of "apple-clang-9.0". That means that most likely it should be `apple-clang-8` instead of 8.0. But on the second thought it might be better to keep .fail.cpp and .pass.cpp more in sync. I think // XFAIL: libcpp-no-deduction-guides is better than listing all unsupported clang versions (see r325205 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL325205>). I didn't test it but if it works, I prefer this approach. Repository: rCXX libc++ https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
