chandlerc added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42787#1000687, @krasimir wrote:
> We could adapt the single-argument version instead, turning: > > foo(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + > ccccccccccccccccc); > > > into: > > foo(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + > ccccccccccccccccc); > I have a mild preference for this, and it seems more consistent. But I don't have a strong preference. However, for each of the other cases shown in the thread so far, i strongly prefer clang-format's current behavior. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D42787 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
