sepavloff marked 3 inline comments as done.
sepavloff added a comment.

Thank you!



================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11995-12006
+    for (auto I : FD->redecls()) {
+      if (I != FD && !I->isInvalidDecl() &&
+          I->getFriendObjectKind() != Decl::FOK_None) {
+        if (FunctionDecl *Original = I->getInstantiatedFromMemberFunction()) {
+          if (Original->isThisDeclarationADefinition()) {
+            Definition = I;
+            break;
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> We should include a comment here explaining why we need to do this (that is, 
> why this doesn't just fall out from the normal `isDefined` check). You can 
> just quote C++ [temp.inst]p2:
> 
> > For the purpose of determining whether an instantiated redeclaration is 
> > valid according to [basic.def.odr] and [class.mem], a declaration that 
> > corresponds to a definition in the template is considered to be a 
> > definition.
Thank you for the reference.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D30170



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D30170: F... Serge Pavlov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D301... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D301... Serge Pavlov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D301... Serge Pavlov via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to