Typz added a comment.
> I don't agree that that's the same thing. The closing brace is still neatly
> aligned with the line of the opening brace (which happens to be just the
> opening brace).
This invariant is not really applicable to switch statements, where code of
each "branch" is already indented with no opening brace. :-)
I can try to change the mode so that we get either "google" style:
switch (x) {
case 0: {
foo():
} break;
}
or "regular indentation" mode (e.g. what would look like no special indentation
rule):
switch (x) {
case 0:
{
foo():
}
break;
}
Generally, would a flag for `CaseBlockIndent` be acceptable for this purpose ?
Or should the behavior simply be selected depending on `IndentCaseLabels` ?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43183
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
