Author: ericwf
Date: Sun Feb 11 13:57:25 2018
New Revision: 324852

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=324852&view=rev
Log:
Mark two issues as complete

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=324852&r1=324851&r2=324852&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Sun Feb 11 13:57:25 2018
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@
 <table border="1">
 <tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
 <tr><td><a 
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2412";>2412</a></td><td><tt>promise::set_value()</tt> 
and <tt>promise::get_future()</tt> should not 
race</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-<tr><td><a 
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2682";>2682</a></td><td><code>filesystem::copy()</code>
 won't create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a 
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2682";>2682</a></td><td><code>filesystem::copy()</code>
 won't create a symlink to a 
directory</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2697";>2697</a></td><td>[concurr.ts] 
Behavior of <tt>future/shared_future</tt> unwrapping constructor when given an 
invalid <tt>future</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a 
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2708";>2708</a></td><td><tt>recursive_directory_iterator::recursion_pending()</tt>
 is incorrectly specified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a 
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2708";>2708</a></td><td><tt>recursive_directory_iterator::recursion_pending()</tt>
 is incorrectly specified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2936";>2936</a></td><td>Path comparison 
is defined in terms of the generic 
format</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 </table>
 
@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@
 <h3>Comments about the "Review" issues</h3>
 <ul>
 <li> 2412 - I think we do this already</li>
-<li> 2682 - Eric - don't we do this already? </li>
+<li> 2682 - We already to this </li>
 <li> 2697 - No concurrency TS implementation yet</li>
-<li> 2708 - Eric? </li>
+<li> 2708 - We already do this </li>
 <li> 2936 - Eric - don't we do this already?</li>
 </ul>
 


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to