Author: marshall
Date: Mon Feb 5 19:23:16 2018
New Revision: 324310
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=324310&view=rev
Log:
Mark issue 3034 as 'Patch Ready'
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=324310&r1=324309&r2=324310&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Feb 5 19:23:16 2018
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3017";>3017</a></td><td><tt>list
splice</tt> functions should use
<tt>addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3020";>3020</a></td><td>[networking.ts]
Remove spurious nested <tt>value_type</tt> buffer sequence
requirement</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3026";>3026</a></td><td><tt>filesystem::weakly_canonical</tt>
still defined in terms of <tt>canonical(p,
base)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3030";>3030</a></td><td>Who shall meet
the requirements of <tt>try_lock</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3030";>3030</a></td><td>Who shall meet
the requirements of <tt>try_lock</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing
to do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3034";>3034</a></td><td>P0767R1 breaks
previously-standard-layout types</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035";>3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s
constructors should be <tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch
Ready</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039";>3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary
<tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and
<tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
<li> 3017 - We don't do the splicing stuff yet</li>
<li> 3020 - No networking TS implementation yet</li>
<li> 3026 - I think this is just wording cleanup - Eric?</li>
-<li> 3030 - Wording changes only?? Do we handle exceptions correctly here?</li>
+<li> 3030 - Wording changes only</li>
<li> 3034 - Need to check if our tests are correct.</li>
<li> 3035 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3039 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
