Author: marshall
Date: Mon Feb 5 17:59:28 2018
New Revision: 324307
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=324307&view=rev
Log:
More patches ready
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=324307&r1=324306&r2=324307&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Feb 5 17:59:28 2018
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2243";>2243</a></td><td><tt>istream::putback</tt>
problem</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2816";>2816</a></td><td><tt>resize_file</tt> has
impossible postcondition</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to
do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2843";>2843</a></td><td>Unclear behavior
of
<tt>std::pmr::memory_resource::do_allocate()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2849";>2849</a></td><td>Why does
<tt>!is_regular_file(from)</tt> cause <tt>copy_file</tt> to report a "file
already exists" error?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
-<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2851";>2851</a></td><td><tt>std::filesystem</tt> enum
classes are now underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Nothing to
do</td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2849";>2849</a></td><td>Why does
<tt>!is_regular_file(from)</tt> cause <tt>copy_file</tt> to report a "file
already exists" error?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to
do</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2851";>2851</a></td><td><tt>std::filesystem</tt> enum
classes are now underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to
do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG2969";>2969</a></td><td><tt>polymorphic_allocator::construct()</tt>
shouldn't pass <tt>resource()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2975";>2975</a></td><td>Missing case for
<tt>pair</tt> construction in scoped and polymorphic
allocators</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2989";>2989</a></td><td><tt>path</tt>'s
stream insertion operator lets you insert everything under the
sun</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Completed</td></tr>
@@ -77,15 +77,15 @@
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3010";>3010</a></td><td>[networking.ts]
<tt>uses_executor</tt> says "if a type <tt>T::executor_type</tt>
exists"</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3013";>3013</a></td><td><tt>(recursive_)directory_iterator</tt>
construction and traversal should not be
<tt>noexcept</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3014";>3014</a></td><td>More
<tt>noexcept</tt> issues with filesystem
operations</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3015";>3015</a></td><td><tt>copy_options::<i>unspecified</i></tt>
underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3015";>3015</a></td><td><tt>copy_options::<i>unspecified</i></tt>
underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3017";>3017</a></td><td><tt>list
splice</tt> functions should use
<tt>addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3020";>3020</a></td><td>[networking.ts]
Remove spurious nested <tt>value_type</tt> buffer sequence
requirement</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3026";>3026</a></td><td><tt>filesystem::weakly_canonical</tt>
still defined in terms of <tt>canonical(p,
base)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3030";>3030</a></td><td>Who shall meet
the requirements of <tt>try_lock</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3034";>3034</a></td><td>P0767R1 breaks
previously-standard-layout types</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035";>3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s
constructors should be
<tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039";>3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary
<tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and
<tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3041";>3041</a></td><td>Unnecessary
<tt>decay</tt> in
<tt>reference_wrapper</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035";>3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s
constructors should be <tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch
Ready</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039";>3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary
<tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and
<tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3041";>3041</a></td><td>Unnecessary
<tt>decay</tt> in
<tt>reference_wrapper</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch
Ready</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3042";>3042</a></td><td><tt>is_literal_type_v</tt>
should be inline</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3043";>3043</a></td><td>Bogus
postcondition for <tt>filesystem_error</tt>
constructor</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="https://wg21.link/LWG3045";>3045</a></td><td><tt>atomic<<i>floating-point</i>></tt>
doesn't have <tt>value_type</tt> or
<tt>difference_type</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
<li> 3026 - I think this is just wording cleanup - Eric?</li>
<li> 3030 - Wording changes only?? Do we handle exceptions correctly here?</li>
<li> 3034 - Need to check if our tests are correct.</li>
-<li> 3035 - <i>Easy to do</i></li>
+<li> 3035 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3039 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3041 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3042 - We already do this.</li>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
