benhamilton marked 2 inline comments as done. benhamilton added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:1214 // FIXME: We likely want to do this for more combinations of brackets. // Verify that it is wanted for ObjC, too. if (Current.is(tok::less) && Current.ParentBracket == tok::l_paren) { ---------------- benhamilton wrote: > stephanemoore wrote: > > With the new parameter does this comment still apply? Maybe we can remove > > it? > Good point. > > This is about <> brackets nested inside () parens, which I believe is > applicable to Objective-C 2.0 generics passed to C/C++ functions, but not to > protocol conformance lists. > > I'll send out a separate diff to add tests and clean up this comment, since I > think the behavior is wanted for ObjC as well, but I think it's unrelated to > this diff. Followup in D42864. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D42650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits