sunfish accepted this revision. sunfish added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D37831#871238, @dschuff wrote: > I think the reasoning was really just that code size reduction is even more > important on wasm than other platforms, and because it's a new ABI there's no > one depending on the default behavior that would break. I agree. Also, on some platforms, -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections can result in less efficient code, however that's not the case on wasm. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D37831 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
