tejohnson added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42680#991938, @pcc wrote:
> This doesn't seem right to me. In a mixed full/thin LTO link the full LTO > module would be compiled during the indexing phase. We don't want to compile > it again in the backend as it could lead at best to duplicate symbol errors > and at worst to miscompiles of `llvm.type.*` intrinsic calls. Good point. The build system will presumably expect an output file to be generated, so probably just compile an "empty" Module in this case? https://reviews.llvm.org/D42680 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
