rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42614#990808, @compnerd wrote:
> Hmm, the only thing that we could fake would be namespaces on the parameter > types. Is that better? I'm not tied to re-using the existing mangling. I'm just worried about re-using the existing mangling causing a problem in the long run. If you're certain that it would never be sensical to talk about e.g. a cli::pin_ptr<__strong id>, then ok. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D42614 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
