djasper accepted this revision.
djasper added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Happy to go forward with this. I think we might also wanna investigate whether 
entirely removing UnbreakableTailLength would be beneficial. I think we 
implemented it as an optimization, but I can actually imagine it saving much. 
Plus the code would be simpler and we would conserve some memory.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D42376



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to