mclow.lists accepted this revision.
mclow.lists added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This looks fine to me. Thanks!
================
Comment at: test/std/re/re.regex/re.regex.construct/bad_ctype.pass.cpp:28
+ } catch (const std::regex_error &ex) {
+ result = (ex.code() == std::regex_constants::error_ctype);
+ }
----------------
I'm a big fan of the "return NOW" style of programming.
But this matches the other tests, so I'm ok with it.
(If I care enough, I'll change them all later)
try { std::regex re(pat); }
catch catch (const std::regex_error &ex) { return ex.code() ==
std::regex_constants::error_ctype; }
return false;
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42291
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
