GorNishanov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41820#974116, @EricWF wrote:
> Is this behavior specified somewhere? Or are we simply adding an extension to > Clang? If so I would really prefer to add my `co_promise` solution (but I > need to write a paper in favor of it first). Before bringing the language change proposal, it makes sense to implement the feature and test it out on real examples. MSVC compiler implemented a number of coroutine features to do sanity testing and put in the customers hands before a feature was proposed. Since this is a non-breaking change, I think it makes sense to put it in and play with it. This particular approach was talked about since 2014, but, no formal proposal was made. I am bringing the paper to upcoming Jacksonville meeting and would like to make sure that we have both implementation and usage experience for the feature. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D41820 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
