george.karpenkov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckSecuritySyntaxOnly.cpp:522
+ ArraySize = Array->getSize().getLimitedValue();
+ if (const auto *String = dyn_cast<StringLiteral>(Source)) {
+ StrLen = String->getLength();
----------------
Nesting this if- inside the previous one would simplify the outer scope and let
you assign to `ArraySize` at declaration size.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckSecuritySyntaxOnly.cpp:526
+ }
+ if (StrLenFound && ArraySize >= StrLen + 1)
+ return;
----------------
Why not put this if-expression into the one above where `StrLen` is found?
That would eliminate `StrLenFound` and remove the potential error surface of
uninitialized read from `StrLen` (the declaration for which should probably be
inside this block as well)
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/security-syntax-checks.m:151
+ char x[5];
+ strcpy(x, "abcd");
+}
----------------
I think it would make sense to add another test case where the warning is
expected, even though string length and array size are known at compile time.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41384
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
