NoQ added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35109#969712, @baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35109#969109, @NoQ wrote: > > > I guess it'd be an `-analyzer-config` flag. You can add it to the > > `AnalyzerOptions` object, which has access to these flags and can be > > accessed from `AnalysisManager`. > > > OK, I can do that. BUt how should I call it? The name should be something the > user also understands, not referring to some internal stuff. Any ideas? I guess a lot of these options already refer to internal stuff. Similarly to off-by-default checkers, such option would not be for users to be thinking whether they want it or not, it is a flag to hide an experimental feature from users completely, while still being able to develop it incrementally, until it's ready to be enabled by default. `-analyzer-config aggressive-relational-comparison-simplification=true` sounds good to me. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35109 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
