aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41815#969708, @JonasToth wrote:
> > Rather than add a warning for the labels, I would just add a note for the > > label when diagnosing the goto (since the goto has a single target). > > That might lead to existing labels without any gotos for them, does it? Maybe > the check could also diagnose labels without corresponding gotos, or does the > frontend already have something like this? `-Wunused-label` already covers this scenario. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D41815 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
