hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clangd/index/SymbolCollector.cpp:89
+ // violations.
+ if (ND->isInAnonymousNamespace())
return true;
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Why don't we include symbols from anonymous namespaces too?
> They are very similar to static symbols.
Yeah, these symbols need a special handling (the qualified name is like
`foo::<anonymous>::bar`), we don't support them well enough. I think it is fine
to ignore them at the moment.
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41759
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
