ilya-biryukov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41495#965627, @nik wrote:
> Hmm, could libclang profit from something like this, too? (or does it > already?) It could. The problem with ASTUnit is that it returns all diagnostics from `store_diag_begin`/`end`, not just the ones from the current file. Skipping function bodies would mean no diagnostics from the preamble. Which may or may not be fine, I'm not sure how important those diagnostics are for the clients. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D41495 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
