CarlosAlbertoEnciso added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39239#912837, @probinson wrote:
> Have you tried the GDB suite yet? If it has no problems, and we can make > LLDB happy, I'm okay with it. Hi Paul, Following the instructions from David Blaikie on how to build/run the GDB suite: "Directions for how to run it would be divined from the buildbot configuration. https://github.com/llvm-mirror/zorg/blob/master/zorg/buildbot/builders/ClangBuilder.py#L883"; 1. I have managed to build the GDB suite using clang as the default compiler. 2. Run the test before and after my changes and the results are the same. === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 20501 # of unexpected failures 1481 # of expected failures 262 # of unknown successes 2 # of known failures 78 # of unresolved testcases 9 # of untested testcases 48 # of unsupported tests 36 The unexpected failures falls into the categories: - Invalid option '-w' to the ADA compiler - Timeout issues - Threading and attaching issues Possible incorrect settings for the GDB suite. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39239 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
