jklaehn added a comment.
Thanks! However, compared to diff 126298
(https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/126298/), there seems to be
duplication in the committed change (maybe some artifacts due to
rebasing/merging?). Should I submit a follow-up patch to fix this?
================
Comment at: cfe/trunk/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py:1488
+
+ def is_abstract_record(self):
+ """Returns True if the cursor refers to a C++ record declaration
----------------
duplicate
================
Comment at: cfe/trunk/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py:3420
+
+ ("clang_CXXRecord_isAbstract",
+ [Cursor],
----------------
duplicate
================
Comment at: cfe/trunk/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py:289
+
+ def test_is_abstract_record(self):
+ """Ensure Cursor.is_abstract_record works."""
----------------
duplicate
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36952
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
