NoQ added a comment. Yeah, we usually try to avoid omissions of modeling in on-by-default checkers because the user may accidentally run into projects in which the unmodeled idiom is common, and then he'd get false positives all over the place. In my case it was just two new positives, both false due to this `dispatch_barrier_sync` idiom.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41042 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
