xazax.hun added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40939#948252, @NoQ wrote:
> Like, it's not the situation when we couldn't figure out the type - it would > have been null in that case. Here we know exactly that the type is void. Oh, thank you for the clarification! Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D40939 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
