hokein added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40897#946708, @malaperle wrote:
> Hi! Have you looked into https://reviews.llvm.org/D40548 ? Maybe we need to > coordinate the two a bit. Hi Marc! Thanks for the input! Yeah, Eric and I are working closely on a prototype of global code completion. We have implemented the initial version (see github <https://github.com/ioeric/clang-tools-extra/tree/clangd-code-completion-global-index>), and the prototype works well for LLVM project (even with a simple implementation), so we plan to split the patch, improve the code, and contribute it back to clangd repo incrementally. For the prototype, we will load all symbols (without occurrences) into the memory, and build an in-memory index. From our experiment, the dataset of LLVM project in YAML format is ~120MB (~38,000 symbols), which is acceptable in clangd. Our rough plan would be 1. Define the Symbol structure. 2. Design the interfaces of SymbolIndex, ASTIndex. 3. Combine 1) and 2) together to make global code completion work (we'd use YAML dataset for LLVM project, note that this is not a final solution, it would be hidden in an `--experimental` flag). 4. Switch to use the dataset from index-while-building when it is ready. ================ Comment at: clangd/Symbol.h:37 +// The class presents a C++ symbol, e.g. class, function. +struct Symbol { + // The symbol identifier, using USR. ---------------- malaperle wrote: > I think it would be nice to have methods as an interface to get this data > instead of storing them directly. So that an index-on-disk could go fetch the > data. Especially the occurrences which can take a lot of memory (I'm working > on a branch that does that). But perhaps defining that interface is not > within the scope of this patch and could be better discussed in D40548 ? I agree. We can't load all the symbol occurrences into the memory since they are too large. We need to design interface for the symbol occurrences. We could discuss the interface here, but CodeCompletion is the main thing which this patch focuses on. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D40897 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
