koparasy wrote: > Thanks for working on this! > > I'd prefer to see it work the opposite way -- mark functions that still need > calling convention lowering applied. That's the state that's worth drawing > explicit attention to in the textual representation of the CIR.
Happy to revert. It is also closer to what I do the other PRs with a similar spirit. However, it will increase the size of the PR. I would expect more test breakage. Will do and ping. Thnx! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/237433 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
