lukel97 wrote: > All that said, I think overall the pipeline is in a pretty good shape with > geomean being neutral or improved, even if individual benchmarks can regress, > it's a good starting point especially considering that it has not enjoyed the > years of optimisations and tuning for specific phase order that the old > pipeline had. > > Does anyone disagree with committing these patches?
No objections on my side, the cactus_r change is recent and not a performance regression from a previous release. So I don't think it's a blocker. Before this lands it would be good to get a final run of SPEC CPU 2026 numbers on AArch64 so it can be included in the PR description. Thanks for pushing this through https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/195886 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
