ojhunt wrote: > I don't like this naming - both the LangOpt and the cli arg seem the wrong > way round? surely this should be LongLongIsInt64 and -flong-long-is-int64? > the current name implies that -fint64-is-long-long would allow int64 to be > defined as int128 on platforms where long long is int128?
Ugh no this issue is even more obnoxious because the kernel is defining its own version of an implementation defined type. Because the standard does not simply make them actually builtin types. Sigh. Either direction of naming is equally awful. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/234780 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
