https://github.com/tbaederr created 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/233360

We already handled block pointers above, so the isReadablePointerType() check 
here is equivalent to isStringPointer().

>From c6b93e59e54f1da4fa1fc563cf966d8155ab1638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?= <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:36:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode][NFC] Make string pointer check more
 explicit

We already handled block pointers above, so the isReadablePointerType()
check here is equivalent to isStringPointer().
---
 clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp 
b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
index c5cc90f5fdd7f..b3ecbe9b898e8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp
@@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ bool CheckLoad(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC, const 
Pointer &Ptr,
   }
 
   // Block and string pointers are the only ones we can actually read from.
-  if (!Ptr.isReadablePointerType())
+  if (!Ptr.isStringPointer())
     return diagnoseDummy(S, OpPC, Ptr, AK);
 
   assert(Ptr.isStringPointer());

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to