ckandeler wrote: > I haven't looked at this closely yet, but we already faced with the problem > that misc-const-correctness check of clang-tidy which you mentioned, is [very > slow ](https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1337) > > So, before landing this we need to be sure, that with this patch there will > be no performance degradation. Please, note that prepare() call for a tweak > must be very fast.
The prepare() call is unaffected. > And maybe we can also check if there is a size change of the binary. I think it's just the one translation unit for the new class used. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/225666 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
