https://github.com/smithp35 commented:

I can't spot anything that differs from existing clang behaviour. It looks like 
clang and GCC may disagree on whether a C++ Empty type needs a return value. 
Not sure if there is anything that can be done here. If I'm right it may be 
worth leaving a comment to note the difference.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/224476
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to