mstorsjo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39918#923070, @ruiu wrote:
> Actually I don't have a strong opinion on that topic. It seems like just > truncating the section name to ".eh_fram" at the linker is good enough, but > how much important is the compatibility with GNU ld? It's hard to say... Right now, the llvm/lld based mingw distribution is incompatible with GNU ld already anyway for other reasons, so doing a fix in lld isn't too bad, but ideally I'd like to work towards having things as compatible as possible of course. Doesn't feel like a very high priority right now though since there's quite enough with more concrete other issues to fix first. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39918 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
