nicebert wrote:

> I think the second commit should be reviewed as a separate PR, and get 
> reviews by Flang/MLIR contributors there.

I'd rather keep these together. The second commit builds directly on the 
lowering work in the first one and doesn't compile without it, and the flang, 
mlir and OpenMPIRBuilder parts of the first commit have to land together as 
well. Splitting it into two PRs is doable, it just turns this into a stack, and 
the clang work then can't land until the other one is reviewed and merged.

Keeping it as two commits was meant to cover this, the flang/mlir change is 
separate so it can be reviewed on its own without splitting the PR. None of 
that side was the goal here either, it came out of the no-loop investigation on 
the clang side, those were the gaps in the shared lowering that no-loop needs 
closed.

Since the PR already has the flang and mlir labels, could the reviewers there 
just look at commit 1 in place?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205325
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to