ferdymercury wrote:

> 2) using patched clang already, then why should upstream clang adapt for 
> that? Shouldn't the patched clang be adapted instead?

Whenever possible and when it does not affect upstream negatively, we are 
trying to reduce the number of patches so that at in a future there is no need 
to have a separate Clang patch build.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218965
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to