================
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+void lvalue_with_imag_int() {
+ int i;
+ __imag__ i = 0; // expected-error {{expression is not assignable}}
+}
+
+void lvalue_with_imag_float() {
+ float i;
+ __imag__ i = 0; // expected-error {{expression is not assignable}}
+}
+
+_Complex float foo() // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
+{
+ float f;
+ __real__ f = 0;
+ __imag__ f = 0; // expected-error {{expression is not assignable}}
+ return f;
+}
+
+_Complex float baz()
+{
+ float f;
+ __real__ f = 0;
+ __imag__ } // expected-error {{expected expression}}
+
+
+typedef _Complex float C;
+C foo() // expected-error {{redefinition of 'foo'}}
----------------
Fznamznon wrote:
Did you mean to name this function differently and check that the error this
patch add is emitted for a typedef too?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218270
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
