mstorsjo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38680#903203, @joerg wrote:
> I've looked at this in some detail now. I'm not exactly sure yet why it is > broken. The patch seems quite wrong to me. DW_CFA_GNU_args_size should be > applied only when unwinding a call instruction and that regard, the commit > message of the original change is quite correct. What I am still trying to > understand is how the precise unwind frame disagrees with the unwinder. @joerg Any update on this matter, how should we move forward with unbreaking the unwinding on i386? https://reviews.llvm.org/D38680 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
