mstorsjo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39365#909706, @rnk wrote:
> Doesn't this change the ABI considerably? I suspect Apple cares about that. It does change the ABI of the lower level unw_* API yes, but it shouldn't be visible outside via the higher level APIs. > Is remotely unwinding a 64-bit thread from a 32-bit process a concern? That's > the main use case that forcing 64-bit words seems to enable. If that's a concern, then the other patch I propsed earlier would make things even more consistent, by using 64 bit words even on ARM EHABI: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39280 https://reviews.llvm.org/D39365 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
