================
@@ -1048,7 +1048,8 @@ def int_callbr_landingpad : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], 
[LLVMMatchType<0>],
 
 def int_structured_gep
     : DefaultAttrsIntrinsic<[llvm_anyptr_ty],
-                            [LLVMMatchType<0>, llvm_vararg_ty],
+                            [LLVMMatchType<0>, llvm_anyvector_ty,
+                             llvm_vararg_ty],
----------------
dtcxzyw wrote:

Having a glance at the original proposal 
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-adding-instructions-to-to-carry-gep-type-traversal-information/88141,
 it looks like we chose an intrinsic instead of a dedicated instruction because 
we didn't care about the flags at that time?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200093
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to