mibintc added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#905596, @jyknight wrote:
> I'd still _very_ much like a solution that is acceptable for all libc to use, > and have that on by default. > > However, I guess this is fine. > > Only concern I have is that it seems odd that so many test-cases needed to be > changed. What fails without those test changes? Those tests fail because they generate preprocessed output and then check carefully for precise results. Since the preprocessed output is different, the comparison fails. I "fixed" the tests by adding the freestanding option which inhibits the new behavior. I'll have to check out and rebuild everything so I can show you exactly the failure mode, I expect I can post details tomorrow. https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
