Author: jrose
Date: Mon Oct 23 19:17:07 2017
New Revision: 316408

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=316408&view=rev
Log:
Unnamed bitfields don't block constant evaluation of constexpr ctors

C++14 [dcl.constexpr]p4 states that in the body of a constexpr
constructor,

> every non-variant non-static data member and base class sub-object
  shall be initialized

However, [class.bit]p2 notes that

> Unnamed bit-fields are not members and cannot be initialized.

Therefore, we should make sure to filter them out of the check that
all fields are initialized.

Fixing this makes the constant evaluator a bit smarter, and
specifically allows constexpr constructors to avoid tripping
-Wglobal-constructors when the type contains unnamed bitfields.

Reviewed at https://reviews.llvm.org/D39035.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp?rev=316408&r1=316407&r2=316408&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp Mon Oct 23 19:17:07 2017
@@ -1818,6 +1818,9 @@ static bool CheckConstantExpression(Eval
       }
     }
     for (const auto *I : RD->fields()) {
+      if (I->isUnnamedBitfield())
+        continue;
+
       if (!CheckConstantExpression(Info, DiagLoc, I->getType(),
                                    Value.getStructField(I->getFieldIndex())))
         return false;

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp?rev=316408&r1=316407&r2=316408&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp Mon Oct 23 19:17:07 
2017
@@ -1931,6 +1931,22 @@ namespace Bitfields {
     };
     static_assert(X::f(3) == -1, "3 should truncate to -1");
   }
+
+  struct HasUnnamedBitfield {
+    unsigned a;
+    unsigned : 20;
+    unsigned b;
+
+    constexpr HasUnnamedBitfield() : a(), b() {}
+    constexpr HasUnnamedBitfield(unsigned a, unsigned b) : a(a), b(b) {}
+  };
+
+  void testUnnamedBitfield() {
+    const HasUnnamedBitfield zero{};
+    int a = 1 / zero.b; // expected-warning {{division by zero is undefined}}
+    const HasUnnamedBitfield oneZero{1, 0};
+    int b = 1 / oneZero.b; // expected-warning {{division by zero is 
undefined}}
+  }
 }
 
 namespace ZeroSizeTypes {

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp?rev=316408&r1=316407&r2=316408&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-global-constructors.cpp Mon Oct 23 19:17:07 2017
@@ -126,3 +126,22 @@ namespace pr20420 {
 void *array_storage[1];
 const int &global_reference = *(int *)array_storage;
 }
+
+namespace bitfields {
+  struct HasUnnamedBitfield {
+    unsigned a;
+    unsigned : 20;
+    unsigned b;
+
+    constexpr HasUnnamedBitfield() : a(), b() {}
+    constexpr HasUnnamedBitfield(unsigned a, unsigned b) : a(a), b(b) {}
+    explicit HasUnnamedBitfield(unsigned a) {}
+  };
+
+  const HasUnnamedBitfield zeroConst{};
+  HasUnnamedBitfield zeroMutable{};
+  const HasUnnamedBitfield explicitConst{1, 2};
+  HasUnnamedBitfield explicitMutable{1, 2};
+  const HasUnnamedBitfield nonConstexprConst{1}; // expected-warning {{global 
constructor}}
+  HasUnnamedBitfield nonConstexprMutable{1}; // expected-warning {{global 
constructor}}
+}


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to